Response Time
24 — 48 hours
After more thoroughly evaluating the "losses" from ES 1.4 to ES 2.0, I was impressed once again at how well it was handled in terms of removing features, virtually no negative effects. 
There is however one concern on my end which is about photo quality.
ES 1.4 had a photo quality setting which was located in Settings > Photos > Uploader
ES 2.0 does not appear to have this setting due to the same location not having this setting. I looked around just in case. As a photographer I take photo quality seriously. So in my case I would set it to 100%. However I understand that some may want to save space or reduce bandwidth usage. Is it set to 100% by default? Was removing the setting intentional? A lot of gallery sites and community extensions out there allow control of image quality from administrators.
I understand the intention of reducing clutter, however in the Photo Uploader section there is currently only one setting which is the opposite of being cluttered.
There is however one concern on my end which is about photo quality.ES 1.4 had a photo quality setting which was located in Settings > Photos > Uploader
ES 2.0 does not appear to have this setting due to the same location not having this setting. I looked around just in case. As a photographer I take photo quality seriously. So in my case I would set it to 100%. However I understand that some may want to save space or reduce bandwidth usage. Is it set to 100% by default? Was removing the setting intentional? A lot of gallery sites and community extensions out there allow control of image quality from administrators.
I understand the intention of reducing clutter, however in the Photo Uploader section there is currently only one setting which is the opposite of being cluttered.
3 Replies
The replies under this section are restricted to logged in users or users with an active subscription with us
