UPDATES EasyBlog 6.0.11 Released! Update to the latest version now!

Helpdesk

Your Time
Our Time
Response Time
24 — 48 hours
We strive to provide the fastest ever response possible. However, we are not super beings.

Allow at least 24 — 48 hours
  Support is offline
It is currently off working hours and most of us aren't around

Rest assured that we will get back to you as soon as the day starts tomorrow!
It is currently a public holiday for us from where we are at.

There may be a delay in our responses but rest assured that we will be back at full speed when we are back to the office.
  Support is offline

ACLs - privacy settings - GDPR issues

Supporter · ·
9:31 PM Sunday, 17 March 2019
High
Hi,

Why is that some items are still visible to guests when a user's privacy is all set to a "minimum" privacy setting to registered users?

From Page views:
- Stream items from any user
- Followers are all listed and linked
- Comments are visible to anyone
- ... and more ...

From Group views:
- Stream items from any user is visible for guests
- Members list, all are listed and linked
- Comments are visible to anyone
- ... and more ...

Same is true for Events ...

A conflict happens with "Public" setting of Groups, Pages, Events, ...
These should also follow the correct privacy settings from both user's own settings and user profile settings.

Shouldn't there be a Viewing Permission Setting in the category creation for all these (Pages, Groups, Events, ...)
- ONLY display owner/administrator activities for guests
- FULLY respect users privacy settings
- Follow Profile Type privacy settings

Plus ...

When moving the mouse over a user name in stream it displays: Access to this profile has been restricted for privacy reasons, no image is displayed in mini header
( - But because of privacy settings user activity should just not be displayed at first ! )
Why then can we also click on the username and access his profile, display his picture and profile banner when they are hidden by restrictions in the hovered mini header ? Where is the logic?
Is the full privacy really respected?
- Should there be a more restrictive Viewing Permission for user to not be displayed/visible at all ?

I am looking forward to reading your explanations and understand your logic about these...
The replies under this section are restricted to logged in users or users with an active subscription with us