EasySocial comes packed with a simple migration from JomSocial, is there any chance of getting a reverse migration on the outside chance that someone would want to go back to JomSocial?
Jthm0138 wrote:
... most likely the Malaysian government.
Justin wrote:
I think it's time for someone to take a time out, or a nap.
Justin wrote:
No worries here Jthm0138,
After reading your review of EasySocial on the JED, I'm sure JomSocial will take you back with open arms!
Jthm0138 wrote:
Still think I need a nap?
Justin wrote:
But back to your last question. If you still planning on going to the highest authority (that being the Malaysian government) over something like this...then yes.
Mark wrote:
Hey,
I have tried to compromise and I certainly do not want to get in an argument with any customers. If it makes you feel better by doing anything you posted above, by all means I am not going to stop you or have anything against you from doing this.
Have a great day!
Justin wrote:
Well said Randall!
Jthm0138 - You've been a good contributor to this forum based on your other posts. It would be a shame for you to go. Just for the heck of it, why not take Mark up on his offer of contacting him personally. I agree with Randall that a strong community can and will be a benefit to us all.
Jthm0138 wrote:
The issue with your logic Randall is that
1) I did clearly request a refund, and was denied.
and 2) StackIdeas has stopped moving forward with EasySocial. They are currently at a standstill, and have been for 5 months. IF EasySocial 1.3 ever comes out (I am guessing we will see a beta sometime this week, and maybe if we are lucky a final version sometime next month) it still does not add any new features worth mentioning. 5 1/2 months for 1.3 and no MAJOR features added? That is not progress, and once 1.3 is out how many months will we wait for 1.4? 3 months? 5 months? 7 months? A year maybe?
To get caught up with the current features available in JomSocial, EasySocial will have to make it to version 1.6, and by the time 1.6 comes around (probably close to a year or year and a half from now at current rate) JomSocial will have added even more features that EasySocial does not have. .... So what platform is my better option?
When EasySocial was pumping out versions and features on a steady basis they had a shot, now that they have slowed down they do not have a chance.
To get caught up with the current features available in JomSocial, EasySocial will have to make it to version 1.6, and by the time 1.6 comes around (probably close to a year or year and a half from now at current rate) JomSocial will have added even more features that EasySocial does not have. .... So what platform is my better option?
When EasySocial was pumping out versions and features on a steady basis they had a shot, now that they have slowed down they do not have a chance.
Randall M wrote:
Enough said on this. I think it best to let Mark respond. Then he can focus with his team and loyal supporters on the positives of moving forward.
Randall
Jthm0138 wrote:
My community has dwindled from over 5,000 active users to less than 10 active users. 90% of the cause of this was loss of the video functionality.
Now luckily for me, I am the ONLY person in the world that can run a community like the one I run, so I can get all of those people back on my site in less than a month once I have videos. But bottom line being what it is 4,990+ members at $5 a month is costing me $24,950 a month that is a provable loss (the actual loss is much higher).
Can you see why I might be a little frustrated?
Jthm0138 wrote:
Justin wrote:
Well said Randall!
Jthm0138 - You've been a good contributor to this forum based on your other posts. It would be a shame for you to go. Just for the heck of it, why not take Mark up on his offer of contacting him personally. I agree with Randall that a strong community can and will be a benefit to us all.
Because as people have pointed out here taking him up on his offer would only slow down production further, and end with both Mark and Myself becoming more disgruntled with one another.
My community has dwindled from over 5,000 active users to less than 10 active users. 90% of the cause of this was loss of the video functionality.
Now luckily for me, I am the ONLY person in the world that can run a community like the one I run, so I can get all of those people back on my site in less than a month once I have videos. But bottom line being what it is 4,990+ members at $5 a month is costing me $24,950 a month that is a provable loss (the actual loss is much higher).
Can you see why I might be a little frustrated?
Justin wrote:
Well said Randall!
Jthm0138 - You've been a good contributor to this forum based on your other posts. It would be a shame for you to go. Just for the heck of it, why not take Mark up on his offer of contacting him personally. I agree with Randall that a strong community can and will be a benefit to us all.
Jthm0138 wrote:
When I made the switch it was not clear that EasySocial did not have video support. In fact there was a previously existing conversation regarding video parsing that helped to confuse the topic and make it appear that EasySocial had better video support than it did.
Jthm0138 wrote:
Videos is a major feature of 1.3 that has now been pushed off till 1.4, and I agree at this point Videos needs to be a core focus of 1.4 if EasySocial is going to stand any chance of being the dominant social networking solution for Joomla! again.
However, the 'all but abandoned' Pages feature really needs to be added back in to the coming soon list (preferably in 1.4 or at most 1.5 release.)
Also other major things that should be high on the priority list for EasySocial 1.4 are "Ability to specify a site image", "Ability to add multiple user's as friend", "Affinity system (whatever that actually will end up being)", "Reminder for inactive users", and the 1.5 features of "Welcome e-mail after registration", "Content plugin to display fields", "Extended EasySocial Menu Module", and from 1.6 "Banning Users", "Intelligent submenu", and "Privacy dropdown".
This list of features is what is needed simply to play catch up with JomSocial. Everything else on the lists will help extend EasySocial to things that JomSocial can not do, but if you can't do what it can do, then there is simple no point. The above list should logically be the focus list for 1.4 (I kind of understand why it is not, but from a feature vs. feature point of view it should be).
Randall M wrote:
The following sounds like it may solve some of the issue faced today by the StackIdeas Team to satisfy the most customer and their needs:
Read more...
http://practicetrumpstheory.com/2010/04/3-rules-for-building-features-in-a-lean-startup/
But as for now, I am done with EasySocial.
Randall M wrote:
So, are you giving up on EasySocial and going back to JomSocial or some other solution then?
Now, onto the question of will I actually come back? That is 100% dependent on how Mark handles this situation once he comes back.
As stated before, he could:
1) Refund my purchase
2) Extend my subscription to include the updates that will have the features I actually subscribed in anticipation of.
If neither of these things are done, I will not be coming back, ever.
Justin wrote:
@Jthm0138 - I don't buy it for a second. If you had "conviction" you wouldn't have bet the farm on software that doesn't suit your needs. You would have contracted custom developers to keep that 25K+ cash stream flowing and maybe even use your movie company connections to source out industry level video sharing integration. Instead, your lawyers will be busy with the Malaysian government...all for a refund of $85 and the cold hard fact that you won't take the blame for overreacting.
Randall M wrote:
The best way to SHUT YOU UP is to NOT PAY ANY MORE ATTENTION TO YOU AND YOUR CONSTANT COMPLAINING.
I have a good hunch that: You could get into TROUBLE in an EMPTY ROOM.
Tango Acquired wrote:
Also Mark,
You need a private message system on your site so that we can avoid unpleasantness like this in the future. It always muffs up the works when non-associated individuals attempt to get in the middle of a conversation that they have no place being in to begin with.