Hey Derk,

I am really sorry for the delay of this reply as it is a weekend for us here. Hm, if the Batch Geocoder only works with the address field, you have 2 options:

1. Request the developer to make the geocoder work on specific set of fields based on the Unique Code. I think this is the best way around this.

2. The other option is to create an address field and re-create the data stored for the existing textbox fields (as address) into a value for the address field. This is much more complicated to be honest.

Hey Mark,

Thank you for the quick response. Your message is clear. But still I have some additional questions.

In one of my profiles I've made a new address field. The user sees only the address field in total: see ES-05

This is not what we want: we like to have street, zip, city, country seperated from each other: see ES-07

In the table you can see for user 371 the fields: apparantly an address field is made with field_id 23. With an SQL query I can move data from 'our address' fields to these. But still geocoder doesn't work. Because of the standard field_id 12 (which one is not in my jos_easy_fields table.

My question is: how do I make a standard addressfield with sub fields street, (number), zip, city a user can see and fill in seperately.

I hope I've made my issue clear?

regards,

Hey Derk,

I am really sorry for the delay of this reply as it is a weekend for us here. Ah, I see! You could actually change the way the field renders the form in the field settings.

Take a look at my screen shot here, http://take.ms/xOByO . This way, when the user registers, they will see this form instead, http://take.ms/BuTUG

Hey Mark,

Thank you very much for the solution. Great!!

Everything works now: we can see the registered users on a google map and we don't need batch geocoder.

Thanks, derk

Hi there,

You are most welcome. Glad to hear that your issue has been resolved now.

As a gentle reminder, kindly start a new thread if you have any other issue in the future so it will be easier for us to manage your inquiry. I will lock and mark this thread as resolved.