By Andy on Saturday, 27 September 2014
Posted in Technical Issues
Replies 6
Likes 0
Views 611
Votes 0
Anyone follow me on this logic....

Currently when viewing event listings, there's an 'Attend Event' button.

If you click it, you then get to see the 'Maybe' and 'Not Attending' buttons (presumably as long as they have been enabled in the event settings).

So my thinking is, why wouldn't all 3 buttons show initially? It seems if you wanted to indicate you weren't going, or were thinking about going, then you have to click 'Attend' first!.. and then of course some 'Maybe' people wouldn't even know they could say 'Maybe' because they understandably might never click 'Attend'

Am I missing some other good logic for having just the 'Attend' button showing first?
Andy, I'm all for open events. My point applied to all event types. Inviting a user applies to open events too, this increases the chances of them joining (open events have invites too). You know, getting friends and such to join. The option is to get a consensus on the invited people to see if they looked at the invite and to get an idea of who is going. So lets say I post a open event that allows anyone to join. I send a invite to everyone from the stacked team only. While I want anyone who is willing to be fun to join, I specifically want certain people or at least know what they are up to. This allows me to get an idea of who is not going to the event and plan accordingly. Random people saying they are not joining isn't very helpful.
·
Saturday, 27 September 2014 09:53
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
I thought the same thing. However I just tested an invite and found that it displays when that user views the invite. It would be silly to show the "maybe" or "no" button for users who were never invited in the first place. So the current method is pretty solid.
·
Saturday, 27 September 2014 09:33
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Thanks Josh. Hmmmm.... Yes I'd agree that if the event was invite only, then you wouldn't want non-invitees to get any options.. but in the case of OPEN events I'm still thinking my point is valid?
·
Saturday, 27 September 2014 09:38
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
OK thanks... I'm buying into your logic and marking it solved here
·
Saturday, 27 September 2014 10:13
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Thanks Andy. I'm all for options that expand flexibility, in this case it's more about having functions work for their intended purposes. I'm sure your aware of this now.
·
Saturday, 27 September 2014 10:30
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
I believe Josh has clearly stated our intentions here
·
Saturday, 27 September 2014 20:26
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
View Full Post