By Josh Lewis on Wednesday, 31 December 2014
Posted in General Issues
Replies 3
Likes 0
Views 549
Votes 0
When uploading a small image (ex. 100x150px) I noticed a few issues:

1. The featured image is literally processed/stretched to be 512x768px. This is does not look good and uses up more resources than necessary.

2. The thumbnail is stretched to 256x384px when processing the image which is scaling it up a bit.

3.. The square image (128x128px) does a little bit of stretching but not much. Not a big deal, but figured I'd mention it.

On the subject of small images, small images do not need to produce all 6 images. I do suppose however this would require a fall back method of some sort. I've seen other site's produce less images when they are smaller. I figured I'd mention this to have another method to save space where extra files don't really do anything.

Attached to this post is a small image to experiment/see this with.
Thanks for the heads up on this Josh but we need all these sizes to standardize the image operation.
·
Thursday, 01 January 2015 14:24
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
I've seen some sites use a fall back method. An example would be if a large image doesn't exist for a display, it uses the medium instead. Just giving this idea in case there is any interest in this.

The main concern here is actually image stretching when generating other image sizes. While it's nice to have an image completely fill a container, a smaller image looks much better than a stretched one.
·
Thursday, 08 January 2015 16:12
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Thanks for the heads up on this Josh, but you will then have a very odd looking site because images appears with different sizes and it really wouldn't look nice!
·
Friday, 09 January 2015 01:41
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
View Full Post