By Josh Lewis on Friday, 19 September 2014
Posted in General Issues
Likes 0
Views 524
Votes 0
Currently the default avatar links strait back to the profile/event/group which seems redundant. Here's an example of this:

http://www.alpineascent.com/profile/stacked

The profile link itself or the name of the object already provides a self-link. The current method implies that the image will open up in a pop box.
Hello Josh Lewis,

Thanks for your feedback, do you mean when i hover this avatar part right? Please advise.
·
Friday, 19 September 2014 17:21
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
That's the right spot. In this case the minor issue is upon clicking it. If there was no "self link" for the profile itself I suppose I could see a use for the picture doing this, but the profile already provides one. As a result the default avatar should not link to the profile itself.
·
Friday, 19 September 2014 23:32
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
I agree with you on this, it's not right.... I like your site template, but you do realize it's not responsive?
·
Saturday, 20 September 2014 00:49
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Thanks, we'll consider this in the future.
·
Saturday, 20 September 2014 01:08
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Josh wrote:

I like your site template, but you do realize it's not responsive?


Thanks for the compliment. Forgot to remove the min-width of 960px from the body. Do you mind testing again? It's a custom template that I made over the past few years (small improvements at a time). I know the header isn't responsive which I should be able to fix once my injuries give me a single full hand! I'm down to a few fingers right now. The columns don't collapse either which I'll consider adding. I admit that I'm a bit of a rebel and am trying to avoid the HTML structure of Bootstrap (my template uses minimum HTML while still using HTML5 tags and should still work on semi old browsers). I still of course am using bootstrap CSS to style bootstrap objects from components. I extracted pretty much only what I needed.
·
Saturday, 20 September 2014 03:54
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
The 960 and up is good, lower is not
·
Saturday, 20 September 2014 06:31
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Whoops, my bad. I thought I linked to my test site which is what I fixed in my last post. I removed the body {min-width: 980px;} from my main site since your last visit.
·
Saturday, 20 September 2014 06:48
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
View Full Post